Rapist made girl struggle to breathe in sexual attack at just 11

Madasar Hussain, 32, of Parkinson Lane, Halifax, was sentenced to four years in prison at Bradford Crown Court on Friday 11 September 2026 after a jury found him guilty of six counts of rape. The offences were committed when Hussain was aged 11 or 12. Judge Ahmed Nadim said the damage inflicted on the victim had been profound and enduring. Daily Dazzling Dawn understands the case involved the sexual exploitation of a vulnerable child, with intimidation, coercion and on occasions physical force.

Court Hears Victim Feared She Would Die

The court heard that during the initial rape Hussain removed the girl's clothing, restrained her and placed a pillow over her face, making it difficult for her to breathe. Daily Dazzling Dawn understands Judge Nadim told the court: "The evidence accepted by the jury was that you removed her clothing, restrained her and placed a pillow over her face making it difficult for her to breathe." The judge said the victim believed she was going to die before the rape began. He described the attack as one that caused decades of psychological trauma. The victim had been unable to recount what had happened for many years, a factor that delayed the case reaching court.

Denials Rejected and Later Convictions Considered

Hussain continues to deny the allegations and has claimed they were fabricated. However, Judge Nadim noted that this assertion stood in sharp contrast to the detailed and persuasive evidence accepted by the jury. The court was told Hussain had subsequently accumulated convictions for violent disorder, dangerous driving and possession of drugs with intent to supply. Judge Nadim said those later offences portrayed a deeply concerning image of his character. The sentencing hearing therefore considered not only the historical rapes but also the defendant's conduct in the years since.

Sentence and Long-Term Restrictions

Hussain was sentenced to four years in prison and ordered to sign the Sex Offenders' Register. He was also issued with a 20-year restraining order prohibiting him from contacting the victim in the case and other members of her family. Such orders are designed to protect victims from further distress and to prevent unwanted contact after a defendant's release. The court's decision reflects the seriousness with which the judiciary treats sexual offences against children, even where the perpetrator was himself a child at the time.

Why Historical Child-On-Child Cases Are Complex

The case raises difficult questions about how the criminal justice system handles historical sexual offences committed by children. In England and Wales, the age of criminal responsibility is 10, meaning a child aged 11 or 12 can be prosecuted. However, cases that are not reported until many years later often require careful assessment of evidence, trauma and the defendant's age at the time of the offence. Daily Dazzling Dawn understands that delayed disclosure is common in sexual abuse cases, particularly where the victim was threatened or coerced. The judge's comments about the victim's decades of psychological trauma underline why specialist support services remain essential.

Support and Safeguarding Implications

The sentencing also highlights the importance of safeguarding and early intervention. When serious sexual harm is committed by a child, agencies must consider both the welfare of the victim and the risk posed by the young perpetrator. In this case, Hussain's later convictions for violent disorder, dangerous driving and drug supply suggest a pattern of offending that continued into adulthood. Judge Nadim's remarks indicate that the court viewed his character as deeply concerning. The 20-year restraining order and registration requirements are intended to manage that risk and protect the public.

Hussain will now serve his prison sentence, after which he will remain subject to the requirements of the Sex Offenders' Register and the restraining order. The victim, who was unable to speak about the offences for many years, has seen the case reach a conclusion at Bradford Crown Court. Daily Dazzling Dawn will continue to monitor developments in this case and related policy questions. The outcome demonstrates that historical allegations can still be pursued and that courts will rely on detailed evidence, even when a defendant continues to deny wrongdoing.