.svg)
A London high court has delivered a decisive verdict in the high-profile defamation case filed by retired Pakistan Army officer Brigadier Rashid Nasir against the controversial YouTuber and former Major Adil Farooq Raja. Justice Richard Spearman KC ruled comprehensively against Raja on Thursday, October 9, 2025, declaring the host's serious allegations of corruption, electoral manipulation, and human rights abuses against the retired Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) officer to be "false, baseless, and malicious." This ruling sets a significant legal precedent for holding online commentators accountable for statements made in the UK concerning public figures in Pakistan.
Massive Financial Penalty and Court Orders
The London High Court ordered Adil Raja to pay approximately £350,000 (around $425,000 or Rs130 million) to Brigadier Nasir. This substantial payment is broken down into £50,000 (around Rs20 million) in damages awarded for the harm inflicted on Brigadier Nasir's reputation, and a large sum of approximately £300,000 (around Rs110 million) to cover the claimant's substantial legal and court costs.
Beyond the financial penalty, the judgment imposes stringent non-monetary requirements that enforce accountability across Raja's social media presence. Justice Spearman ordered Raja to:
- Immediately stop publishing the defamatory statements and permanently refrain from repeating the allegations.
- Publish a summary of the verdict on all his social media platforms, including his popular YouTube channel and X (formerly Twitter) account, confirming that his claims against Brigadier Nasir were untrue.
- Issue a formal public apology and provide a written assurance to the court that he will not repeat the baseless claims in the future.
The Defamation Case Details and Judicial Scrutiny
The lawsuit, initiated in August 2022 and made public following Raja’s separate controversy involving Pakistani actresses in April 2023, centred on nine specific videos and social media posts. In these publications, Raja had levied a litany of grave charges against Brigadier Nasir, including that he had established an "election cell" in Lahore for political manipulation, interfered in court proceedings, engaged in political dealings on behalf of senior military figures, and abused his authority.
The court's detailed judgment emphasized that Raja had failed to produce any credible evidence or reliable sources to support his accusations throughout the trial, which took place in July 2025. Justice Spearman specifically noted that the remarks were "inflammatory and intended to damage Brigadier Naseer's reputation and manipulate public perception," having caused particular harm within the British Pakistani community. The testimonies of Raja's three presented witnesses—journalist Shaheen Sehbai, former PTI leader Shahzad Akbar, and Syed Akbar Hussain—were found not to have substantiated any of the key allegations. Earlier in the proceedings, in April 2024 and June 2024, Raja had already been ordered to pay smaller interim sums and had several applications, including a plea to stay the trial, dismissed by the court.
Reaction and Global Significance
Brigadier Rashid Nasir's legal team underscored that the verdict is a "victory for truth" and a critical landmark that reinforces that free speech protections do not extend to deliberately spreading unfounded and malicious claims online.
Adil Raja responded to the judgment on X, expressing his "disappointment" and noting that "The judge was not with us." He concluded his statement by asserting his resolve was "undeterred" and vowing to continue his "struggle for democracy in Pakistan." The case highlights the escalating risks faced by political commentators abroad, demonstrating the global reach of UK libel law and its capacity to impose severe penalties on individuals using digital platforms for politically charged commentary without factual basis. The judgment stands as a powerful warning against the spread of what the court deemed "serious and deliberately false" accusations.
