The political chasm between Cardiff Bay and Westminster widened significantly this week as Baroness Morgan of Ely, the Welsh First Minister, declared that migrants remain strictly "welcome" in Wales. In a stark departure from the rhetoric emanating from Sir Keir Starmer’s government in London, Lady Morgan flatly rejected the use of "tough anti-immigration noises" as a tool to court disillusioned voters.
This intervention comes at a precarious moment for Welsh Labour. While Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood recently unveiled stringent asylum policies—including a potential 20-year bar on refugee settlement—Lady Morgan is carving out a distinct ideological niche. Her refusal to mirror the UK government’s hardening tone raises a critical question: Is this a stance born of deep-seated moral conviction, or is it a calculated strategic firewall erected to save Welsh Labour from an electoral wipe-out?
The Argument for Principle
Supporters of the First Minister argue that her position is rooted in the demographic and economic realities of Wales rather than focus groups. Lady Morgan invoked the industrial history of the nation to justify her open-door philosophy, citing the explosion of the Rhondda population from a mere 500 in 1811 to over 150,000 a century later. She posited that Wales is fundamentally a "nation built on waves of immigration," suggesting that hostility toward newcomers contradicts the Welsh identity.
Furthermore, the First Minister anchored her argument in the practical necessities of the Welsh NHS. With the health service under immense strain, she highlighted that in West Wales alone, 48 per cent of doctors and dentists were trained overseas. By framing migration as a pillar of public service stability rather than a cultural threat, Morgan is attempting to shift the debate from ideology to utility. In her view, alienating migrants is not just morally questionable but functionally disastrous for the Welsh healthcare system.
The Political Calculus
However, seasoned observers see the shadow of the upcoming Senedd elections in May behind these compassionate declarations. Labour faces a historic threat to its dominance in Wales, squeezed by the nationalist appeal of Plaid Cymru on the left and the populist surge of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK on the right. The stakes were laid bare in the recent Caerphilly by-election—a seat held by Labour for a century—where the party plummeted to a humiliated 11 per cent, watching Plaid Cymru narrowly edge out Reform.
Lady Morgan explicitly stated she would not "chase Reform down a path" of anti-immigration rhetoric to win back votes. This appears to be a tactical gamble that Labour cannot out-flank Reform on the right. Instead, Morgan seems intent on consolidating the progressive vote that might otherwise bleed to Plaid Cymru, while betting that "disillusioned" Reform voters are driven by a desire for change rather than inherent racism. By refusing to engage in a culture war, she is attempting to decontaminate the brand of Welsh Labour, distinguishing it from the increasingly centrist and authoritarian signaling coming from Downing Street.
A Wider Rift with Westminster
The migration split is merely the latest front in a broader campaign of differentiation. The First Minister has already criticized the UK government’s "bungled" decision to withdraw winter fuel payments—a move she noted would disproportionately devastate Wales’s older population and housing stock. She has also backed backbench rebellions regarding cuts to disability benefits and signaled support for ending the two-child benefit cap.
These maneuverings suggest that Lady Morgan is acutely aware that the "Starmer project" is currently damaging the Labour brand in Wales. With polls suggesting Labour could lose control of the parliament for the first time in 26 years, the First Minister is effectively running as the leader of an opposition party within her own wider political family.
The Road to May
As the countdown to the May election continues, Lady Morgan maintains that she still aims to be the biggest party, though she has not ruled out future cooperation with Plaid Cymru. Her strategy relies on the hope that Welsh voters will appreciate a leader who says "that’s not who I am" when presented with populist anti-migrant narratives.
Yet, the risk remains palpable. With nearly half of the current Senedd members stepping down and morale tested by recent defeats, Welsh Labour is navigating turbulent waters. Morgan’s bet is that a message of inclusivity, backed by the historical context of the valleys and the reality of the NHS, will resonate more deeply than the "tough" posture adopted by her colleagues in Westminster. Whether this is viewed by the electorate as principled leadership or a desperate attempt to hold back the tide of Reform UK will likely decide the future of Welsh governance.