.svg)
The corridors of Pentonville and other UK correctional facilities are currently home to a grim, record-breaking defiance that the British government appears content to resolve with body bags. As the pro-Palestine hunger strike enters its third month, the physical collapse of the participants has moved from a medical warning to an imminent catastrophe. While the state clings to the "separation of powers" as a shield for its inaction, the reality on the ground suggests a far more disturbing motivation: a calculated indifference toward activists whose identities and causes do not align with the political status of the ruling class.
Beyond the Limits of Human Endurance
In the history of British civil disobedience, few have pushed the physical envelope as far as those currently refusing food for the Palestinian cause. To find a comparison, one must look back to the 1981 IRA hunger strikes, where ten men died between 46 and 73 days of fasting. Today, Heba Muraisi, a 31-year-old activist of Arab heritage, has surpassed the 65-day mark. She is now experiencing the onset of organ failure symptoms, including severe muscle spasms and respiratory distress.
Kamran Ahmed, 28, a British Muslim of South Asian descent, has reached day 58. He has been hospitalized five times, reporting intermittent hearing loss—a clinical sign of neurological degradation. Alongside them is Lewie Chiaramello, 22, who, despite the extreme risk posed by his Type 1 diabetes, has maintained an intermittent fast for 44 days. These individuals are not merely "protestors"; they are professionals, students, and family members who have been held in pre-trial detention for over 18 months—triple the standard six-month limit—effectively serving a sentence before ever being found guilty of a crime.
A Government Indifference Rooted in Identity
The central question haunting this crisis is why the Ministry of Justice and Home Office have remained remarkably silent while British citizens waste away. When compared to the government's response to other forms of civil unrest, the lack of engagement here is deafening. Critics argue that this negligence is inextricably linked to the racial and religious identities of the strikers. In a system where Muslims and ethnic minorities are already disproportionately represented in the carceral system, the refusal to meet with these hunger strikers feels less like a legal boundary and more like a targeted dismissal.
By framing the strikers as "serious offenders" before a jury has even heard their case, the government utilizes a narrative of securitization that is frequently applied to Muslim activists. This "othering" allows the state to ignore the humanitarian urgency of the situation. If these were white, middle-class activists striking over a domestic economic issue, the public and political pressure for a resolution would be insurmountable. Instead, because they stand against the UK-based manufacturing of Israeli arms, they are treated as disposable entities whose deaths would be a footnote rather than a national scandal.
The Medical Reality of a Breaking Body
The government’s dismissal of the strike is often bolstered by online detractors who question the timeline of human starvation. However, medical experts like Dr. James Smith have categorized this as the "critical phase." The human body, when deprived of nutrients for over 60 days, begins to consume its own vital organs to keep the brain functioning. The hearing loss reported by Ahmed and the breathing difficulties reported by Muraisi indicate that the body's internal infrastructure is failing.
The advancement in modern medical supplementation provided by prison healthcare—often cited as the reason they are still alive—only serves to prolong the agony and the window in which the government can choose to intervene. The state is essentially monitoring their decline with clinical precision, choosing to watch the "ping pong" of their health rather than addressing the core demands: an end to the censorship of prisoner communications and a review of the unprecedented pre-trial detention lengths.
Institutional Cruelty and the Shadow of 1981
The Ministry of Justice claims that meeting the prisoners would create "perverse incentives." This is a hollow rhetorical device used to justify institutional cruelty. There is no "perverse incentive" in ensuring that citizens are not held in limbo for 18 months without trial. There is no "unconstitutional" barrier to a minister discussing the human rights conditions within their own prisons.
The current strike is now one of the longest coordinated hunger strikes in UK history, surpassing the duration at which many of the 1981 strikers succumbed to death. By refusing to blink, the government is setting a dangerous precedent: that the lives of those who dissent against the military-industrial complex—particularly those from minority backgrounds—carry no weight. As Kamran Ahmed noted from his cell in Pentonville, the government seems to be waiting for a body bag to solve a political problem. If a death occurs, it will not be a failure of the judicial system, but a deliberate choice by a government that has decided some lives are not worth the breach of protocol.
_1.jpg)