.jpeg)
.svg)
Exposing the hidden network and high-stakes legal battle surrounding ASHA’s leadership as whistleblowers claim a "climate of fear" and systemic corruption.
The prestigious veneer of community leadership is stripping away as a High Court battle exposes a web of alleged bribery and financial nepotism at the heart of the UK’s social housing sector. Toaha Qureshi MBE, once celebrated as a bridge-builder between governments and grassroots communities, now faces a fight for his professional survival. At the center of the storm is a 10 million property fund and explosive claims of "under-the-table" cash offers intended to bypass public accountability.
The $10 Million Offer and "Puppet" Boards
Legal documents filed in the High Court detail a shocking encounter between Qureshi and Birmingham City Councillor Morriam Jan. It is alleged that Qureshi and his son, Umar Mahmood, offered "generous" illicit payments to ensure a 10 million social housing investment remained free from pesky oversight. The claim suggests that Qureshi described his own board members as "puppets on a string," signaling a total collapse of corporate governance within the Ash Shahada Housing Association (ASHA). While Qureshi dismisses the 10 million fund as a "myth," the litigation paints a picture of an executive duo operating with absolute, unchecked authority over public millions.
The Family Business: Contracts, Refurbishments, and Hidden Ties
Beyond the bribery allegations, the case shines a light on what whistleblowers describe as a "succession network" of family-controlled firms. While ASHA expanded rapidly into Birmingham’s "Wild West" exempt accommodation market—pulling in £27.5 million in 2022 alone—public funds were allegedly diverted to benefit the inner circle. Reports indicate Qureshi’s other son, Saad Qureshi, resides in a £500,000 property in Croydon, which was reportedly refurbished using £200,000 of association funds. This pattern of internal contracting, where tens of thousands of pounds allegedly flowed to companies owned by sons and in-laws, suggests a systemic blending of public charity and private gain.
The Origin of Power: From Global Mediator to Local Mogul
Toaha Qureshi’s rise is a masterclass in networking. Of Pakistani origin, Qureshi leveraged his heritage and deep ties to the Pakistan-UK diaspora to position himself as a vital intermediary for the British establishment. His website is a digital gallery of power, featuring handshakes with King Charles III, Bill Clinton, and Sadiq Khan. This social capital, solidified by his 2010 MBE, provided the shield necessary to build a housing empire that now oversees a £47 million turnover. However, this same network is now under scrutiny as the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) steps in, citing non-compliance and appointing new board members to wrestle back control from the Qureshi family.
Retaliation and the "Climate of Fear"
The most chilling aspect of the High Court filing involves the treatment of dissenters. Former board member Joseph Mbang alleges he was met with death threats and a coordinated campaign of character assassination after raising the alarm. The legal claim describes a "climate of intimidation" so severe that other board members reportedly withdrew support for suspending the executives out of fear for their families' safety. Qureshi and Mahmood deny these claims, asserting they are the true whistleblowers and victims of a retaliatory strike by Mbang following his removal from the board in late 2025.
What Happens Next: The Regulatory Crackdown
The immediate future for ASHA hinges on the RSH’s next move. With the regulator already utilizing enforcement powers to overhaul the board, a full-scale forensic audit is expected to follow. The High Court will soon determine whether the "derivative action" brought by Mbang can proceed, potentially leading to the permanent removal of the Qureshi family from the organization they built. As the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) intensifies its wider probe into the £300 million social housing sector, the ASHA case may serve as the landmark trial that ends the era of "licence to print money" for unregulated landlords.
