.jpg)
.svg)
The UK’s fledgling alternative left-wing political movement, known provisionally as Your Party, is tearing itself apart before its official founding, raising profound questions about the viability of a socialist project outside the established Labour structure. The crisis centres on a bitter internal power struggle between former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and his co-founder, Coventry South MP Zarah Sultana, leading to the first major defection: the highly symbolic resignation of Blackburn MP Adnan Hussain.
Hussain, a member of the Independent Alliance (IA) group of MPs who won their seats on an anti-war, pro-Palestine platform, quit the steering group citing a “toxic, exclusionary and deeply disheartening” culture. His departure follows public accusations from the IA—which includes MPs Shockat Adam, Ayoub Khan, and Iqbal Mohamed—that Sultana unnecessarily delayed transferring an estimated £800,000 to £850,000 in crucial party donations and membership levies. The Independent Alliance saw this funding dispute, which broke just minutes before Sultana’s high-profile appearance on BBC Question Time, as a “deliberate attempt to sabotage” her by rival factions fearing her potential leadership. The real story, however, is a deeper philosophical chasm, Daily Dazzling Dawn realized.
The True Division: Grassroots Movement vs. Westminster Faction
The ongoing conflict is not simply about an obscure policy on trans rights, as some media coverage suggests, but a fundamental disagreement over the party’s soul. Corbyn’s vision reportedly favoured a slow, grassroots movement built from the bottom up, while Sultana, after her dramatic resignation from the Labour Party in July 2025, and others, pushed for a faster, more top-down, Westminster-focused approach that risks replicating the centralisation flaws of the old Labour Party.
Adnan Hussain and the Independent Alliance, largely representing working-class Muslim communities motivated by Labour’s stance on Gaza, believed they were building a genuinely “broad church” that could accommodate diverse social views. Hussain lamented that “particularly Muslim men” were facing “dismissive attitudes” and “veiled prejudice” when attempting to articulate the complex social positions within their constituencies.
The uncompromising counter-argument from Sultana’s camp is that an “ironclad commitment to trans rights is non-negotiable for a socialist party,” effectively drawing a hard line that excludes the social conservatism prevalent in some minority communities. This ideological policing, rather than a strategy of patient political education, risks alienating a massive new electoral base that only recently left Labour.
The Question of Leadership: Corbyn’s Choice and the Apsana Begum Factor
Jeremy Corbyn’s political future is inextricably linked to the success of this new party. Its implosion represents not merely a setback, but potentially the final failure of his long-held ambition to formalise a radical mass movement outside the mainstream.
Corbyn's decision to co-lead the founding of the new party with Zarah Sultana, confirmed after a July vote by the organising committee, was a strategic move to combine his generational appeal with a younger, media-savvy face. However, this has not been without controversy, with some critics questioning if he was overly reliant on her for the front-facing leadership.
An alternative figure frequently mentioned in left circles is Apsana Begum, the Poplar and Limehouse MP. Begum was suspended from the Labour Party in July 2024, alongside Sultana and six other 'rebels' for voting against the two-child benefit cap—an act of conscience over policy that has since been vindicated by Labour’s own internal review and the party’s subsequent decision to lift the cap. Begum’s suspension lasted until September 2025, a significantly longer period than some of her peers, but she ultimately did not resign from the Labour Party as Sultana did.
While Sultana and Begum share a similar background—both being principled socialist women of colour—Begum's decision to remain in Labour means she was never an option for the co-leadership role offered to Sultana. Whether her longer experience of intra-party factionalism and less confrontational public style would have provided a more unifying presence than Sultana’s remains a profound hypothetical.
A Beacon of Hope for the Left, UK and European
The stakes of the Your Party crisis extend far beyond Islington or Coventry. The failure of this project would send a devastating message across the United Kingdom and continental Europe: that the path for a mass, radical, left-wing alternative is closed.
In Europe, social democratic and traditional left parties are universally struggling. The political axis has shifted from the old Left-Right economic divide to a cosmopolitan-versus-populist split. The British context is even more pronounced, with political support increasingly cleaved along a libertarian-authoritarian divide intensified by Brexit.
Corbyn’s project was seen as a way to re-establish an economically-focused, anti-austerity, mass-movement socialism that could transcend these new cultural boundaries. If he cannot hold together a handful of like-minded independent MPs—whose primary electoral success was based on anti-war politics—the political vacuum on the left will only deepen. The true beneficiaries of this internal implosion will be the centrist parties, who will claim that radicalism is inherently unworkable, and the populist right, who thrive on working-class alienation from politically correct, ideologically narrow, metropolitan elites. The upcoming founding conference is now viewed less as a coronation and more as a last-ditch effort to save the dream of an independent socialist future.
.jpg)